Subject: I don’t fit in with any current stereotype
October 10, 2006
Mr. Critical is very hard to stereotype: “never hurt an innocent person” is very hard to understand:
Concerning torturing terrorists, if information in stopping the killing of “innocent” people (only) can be had by torturing someone, then it is well to do. However, you must be certain that the prisoner has that information. However, because of the many examples I’ve mentioned in the past, the human mind will have difficulty not extending this to torturing other war prisoners, and even inmates in American prisons / jails / during arrests (excessive force), just for revenge and/or entertainment reasons, especially if they don’t like the prisoner’s attitude / mouth. I hear stories all the time of this kind of abuse of authority. I heard it happens every day in Texas. And, this is with present laws forbidding it. So, can you imagine the carnage if our laws allow (some) of it: Pandora’s Box. Therefore, to overrule, Jesus’ teaching of non-violence (for us) should be the standard, simply because we are all too stupid to judge correctly, fairly and unbiasly; and, most dangerously, we’re not aware of it. Since we all are just dumb animals, we are emotionally limited to either we like him or we don’t like him; feeling subconscious tendencies to have him suffer for life or just let him go. It’s like shopping with rich people (who have had few problems through life): when seeing new ideas / products, they either “love it” or “hate it,” one extreme or the other. “Excessive force” is a police officer’s way of letting our criminals know that it’s okay for the system people to break the rules, but it not okay for the criminal to break the rules. Somehow it makes the criminal see the fairness of that, so his mind is more set for society when he’s let out. Then, no one knows why he’s back in so fast.
Three school shootings in one week:
Boy! You’ve got me on that one: I don’t know how to solve that kind of stuff any better than anyone else. I agree with those who think the media, by telling the story(s), prompt other deranged weirdoes to follow the idea. But, the media should tell the stories regardless. I do know that until someone like me becomes religious leader of the world (ha-ha-ha), this kind of stuff will continue into our future. E.g.: Parents and the schools need to teach the Golden Rule as a priority subject. That is, give daily examples of when someone has followed the Golden Rule and examples when someone has not abided in the Golden Rule. But, to do that properly, a teacher would have to give examples all the way from the school principal to the President. And that’s just not going to happen in today’s hierarchy, bootlick based society. Sure, we have Freedom of Speech, but it is still a brand new way of thinking for the human animal. Also, since these were also sexual assaults, we living in a society based on “conditional” sex, probably helped fuel the motive. Human thinking animals: still dumb animals or very few good thinkers? I don’t think the hippies of the 60s even knew what “free love” was supposed to be; or, it was impossible to maintain in today’s church controlled society. I think the drugs were the hippies’ main downfall. (You see, I don’t fit in with any stereotype.) I guess we have to first find the true value of Freedom of Speech: “Will you bite the hand that feeds you? [Or,] will you stay down on your knees?” –Nine Inch Nails, 2005. Maybe I could just be the religious leader of the younger generation (who are rapidly falling away from religion), and then the trillions of future souls will reap the benefits. Being in charge of a bunch of geezers doesn’t really do a lot for me anyway. As soon as they all die, maybe the future can live. “Everybody's making love and no one really cares” –John Lennon, (Nobody Told Me), 1970.
Civil Rights violations:
In a recent Fox News interview with Yoko Ono, she talked about the major difficulty her and John Lennon went through back in the early 70s, when John was put under surveillance, harassed and threatened by the U.S. government, just because he expressed his views against the Vietnam War. In other words, he simply practiced Freedom of Speech. Now, we all know that the Nixon administration did whatever it wanted to do, regardless of laws and civil rights, but I don’t think today’s administration is really that much different. I think today’s government just has many more new toys to play with – that’s the only difference. I wouldn’t be surprised that the government now knows that I just farted… and can probably smell it! If that’s the case… then maybe this highly advanced technology isn’t so bad after all! Apparently there’s a movie out now called The U.S. vs. John Lennon.
“God’s” (today’s churches’) marital love solution:
If any of you like the sound of an electric guitar, and guitar-ed of listening to the studio version of Jimi Hendrix’s Hey Joe, download the Woodstock 69 version, and crank it up.
The real solution:
Seriously, I think the only way to the ultimate solution is to first do a government study researching how dumb we all are, indicating examples, instead of our never-ending bootlick. Especially where we believe our own lies. And, be nice at other times. Technically, the catch-22 is, because we all are too stupid to not bootlick, and be unbiased, it’s just a matter of time before something majorly destructive does happens. America is doing its darnedest (allocating as many troops as possible) to make certain more and more people want to do it (kill us). We might as well have Henry-the-VIII in charge. My way just doesn’t meet with people’s emotional self-centered anger, fear, and trust in those they paid to know answers. I constantly see those kinds of minds on the news. Hopefully you know what I’m talking about.
Another all new idea:
And, today, we have “fair and unbiased reporting” from Fox News. I guess that’s the new first step to a future implementation down-the-road. Again, 99% talk supporting Israel and 1% talk supporting all the others is not quite yet “fair and unbiased.” But it might be a start. I’d still like to hear “something” about Kuwait’s slant drilling into Iraqi oil fields prior to the Gulf War. Preferably spelled out by someone on the other side. Actually, since most of the participators in the news are Americans, crucial issues should get over 50% of the other side’s time, just so Americans can be sure to make decisions based on both sides. Just keep playing it over if there’s less quantity, like we do a lot on other issues. Yeah, I know the words “fair” and “unbiased” is easy to say but hard to do.
For Fox News:
Fred Phelps: Westboro Baptist Church: Kansas’ Hate Crime Headquarters:
My heart goes out the same as everyone else’s to those who had a son who’s died in Iraq, those miners, the little Amish girls, etc. I’m also appalled by their irrational protests, and can’t help liking Hannity when he smites Shirley Phelps Roper. But, I’m not going to get mad, I’m going to get glad; because, popular anti-gay groups who make themselves the biggest morons in the country, has to be a good thing to combat all the other status-quo gay prejudice. E.g., people who have experienced victimization during their loved one’s funeral may very well stop their discrimination against gays just to spite the absurdity and insult of the cruel protestors. Tell the gay groups about that. But, don’t tell Fred. Not yet. Someday I’ll enjoy proving his New Testament translations wrong; but, until then, I think Fred’s endeavors are a God Sent thing that needs to be given more time to manifest to its finest extent. I’m sure I’m the only one who knows enough about the subject to correctly bring him down. I.e., I’d first get him to commit to not only stop his protests, but repent of all his years of errors “if” he is wrong about the New Testament. Then, after I present my evidence, I’d later explain to him how he’s not really working for God, he only cares about his own personal agenda, when he continues his condemnation against gays regardless: just like James Dobson. But, until then, just tell him I said to keep up the good work, Fred! Colmes said it best when he told Shirley that she’s too pathetic to get anger over. – Just explain that to the families at the funerals; or, they could all just start singing: “They're creepy and they're kooky, mysterious and spooky, they're all together ooky: the Phelps family.” I do preach kind of like the Phelps’ do, but I’m on the totally other end of the coin. I’m probably the only living person who can properly and intelligently refute them successfully. I even have more conclusive prove on my Christian sexual stance, that I haven’t even presented yet – and it’s the kind that everyone will easily understand as irrefutable. All I can say is that Jesus Christ is the true messenger of God. And God has set me up very nicely. Everyone else seems to just say what the Phelps’ want to hear. It is a shame how they can get a tremendous amount of more media exposure than my Goldenrule writings can get. Maybe if I protested funerals to show how everybody’s going to hell just because ice cream melts in the summer, would I get an hour of radio time? The only problem is, that would be too much of a contradiction to the true Godly message I’m trying to present. So, since I’m not evil, I’m just going to have to put up with all the secrecy. Of course, the real problem could be, my message might be harder to understand than Fred’s. Moreover, since it’s important for me to stay anonymous – otherwise, I’d just turn into another bootlicker – I’d have to just have someone else read it to the audience. The next time I see them protesting a concert, etc. locally, I think I’ll have two of my female followers kiss each other down near them, just to see how much humans can resemble hunched-back, hissing cats. Well… the Phelps’ aren’t exactly “innocent.” You think I oughtta wait til I can start eatin’ my spinach again? They are probably the damnedest thing you’ll ever see: E.g.: They’ll be standing on an American flag inverted on a flagpole, giving you dirty looks as you walk by. They can’t help but píss you off, regardless of your views about the flag. So, I’ll write about how it is that flag that allows them to stand on it. But, nevertheless, flags have caused, justified, and continually fueled a lot of wars. (Mr. Critical is difficult to understand.) The Goldenrule should be the only thing that everyone should worship. And, that’s just a word; but, is the complete instruction from God. The Goldenrule is not a graven image. The Goldenrule is the only thing that can save the world.
Osama bin Laden’s mailing address:
In 1998, I tried to procure an address for Osama bin Laden, because he was listed as the number one terrorist, but, or course, was unable to find one. If my mailings had reached him, possibly things could have been different, like in the case of Muammar Gaddafi. But, everyone seems to want to just keep my stuff to themselves. Even the “good” people seem to only care about how it affects their soul alone. The difficult-to-argue-against irrefutable logic of “never justified in killing an innocent person” could have avoided the World Trade Center attacks.
Clinton accused of not trying to get bin Laden:
I remember reprimanding Clinton for killing innocent people in his efforts to get bin Laden. So Americans should be proud. Especially since Bush, today, isn’t even looking for him. Reading between the lines, I think Bush and bin Laden actually secretly communicated back in late 2001 and made an agreement that Bush would not pursue him as long as bin Laden didn’t strike on American soil again. So, the Afghan war stayed in its territory (not further pursuing bin Laden), the Anthrax in the mail stopped (which would be easy to restart), and since nothing has happened direct on American soil since, I’m open for discussion if his decision was a right one. I think he should have extended it to the rest of the world, though, to have saved Spain, London, etc., but it’s easy to figure how Bush thinks. I think bin Laden was the first to initial the talk with Bush, after he caught word of Bush’s “wanted dead or alive” (which was really my idea taken off my government monitored computer – yes, they have that capability), and with my letter (which was also mailed to bin Laden via the Taliban) explaining the assured effectiveness of dropping said flyers in bin Laden suspected areas. Just bring his head in a bag across the border, and you will live a very happy life. Well, you know me: I suggested using 72 “real” virgin wives as a reward, because a large monetary reward given to a terrorist would not be advisable, for obvious reasons (if you have a high I.Q.). But, Bush, of course, was restricted to use the monetary method instead. Bush even used my correlation to the Old West, all which I keyed into my computer just one day before he said it. I mailed the letters out anyway (because I am working for God) even though “I” probably looked like just a dumb copy-cat. You see, I monitored the 9/11 news quite a bit and never heard anyone mention a “wanted dead or alive” scenario, especially with an Old West Wanted poster theme, until Bush presented it as solely his idea (9-17-01), exactly one day after I keyed it into my preliminary unmailed document. So what am I supposed to think? Bush did use my basic reward idea to easily get the mandatorily important Uday and Qusay, and Saddam Hussein himself, but I heard we never paid the informant(s). So, if Osama bin Laden knows about that, then he will be able to easily tell his people about the trust and integrity of the United States, for his assured safety, if fliers ever fall. So, now, because of that, I don’t even think the “real” 72 virgin wives idea would work. Sure, I had a “can’t miss” outline: I advised to even send nude pictures of the 72 virgin women: The lust degree of those poorer Muslins has to be the most intense in the world. But, only one possible thing could mess it up: the loss of them trusting our word. Yes, I knew we weren’t going to really offer willing women (rather expensive prostitutes) in today’s sexually ignorant world, but I just enjoyed presenting the by-far, best way to definitely get him. ($25 million dollars could better buy quite a few virgins to live with the rewardee.) You see, when things are going pretty good, no one wants to listen to people like me; but, when things like 9/11 happen, they do want to hear what I’ve got to say about it. So, I’m glad you’re listening (the American in me actually doesn’t like it, but the religious teacher in me says it’s good).
I remember shortly after my (cc) letter to Osama bin Laden via the Taliban (prior to their fall), in the very next tape, bin Laden purposely explained how he is disagreeing with someone’s philosophy about never hurting an innocent person, saying that since we have killed innocent Arabs, he is justified in killing our innocent people. I started another very long letter, but it never got finished, and by then anyway, there was no Taliban address to be found. My 1998 paper had enough explanations and examples to probably win him. So, I guess none of us could help but say bye-bye to Spanish railroads, etc.
George W. Bush is not as evil as most people:
Even though I correctly harshly slam his evil and stupidity, I think George W. Bush is actually relatively more ethical than the average / past leader(s). I think Bush’s main problem is him and his staff think they already know it all, which includes never admitting fault. Therefore, the bigger problem may still be the other “normal” congressional, business, etc. leaders who may be much more evil and self-centered than Bush. I’ve never before heard of a leader dropping food packages for civilians as we did during the Afghan invasion (with other military methods which I disapproved). You see, I swamped him with a lot of Golden Rule teachings right before that invasion, but I was basically out to lunch before the Iraqi invasion. This is probably why there has been a lot less insurgency problems in Afghanistan verses Iraq (who didn’t get food drops). I think food drops can make a country’s people think we’re only 50% evil, where Iraqis seem to believe we’re 100% evil. Another thing about Iraq (and mainly generically): When you eliminate or kill a leader of a country, you should let his staff (or unobstructed people) pick the next leader, and simply tell him to not do what the ousted leader did wrong (and it should only apply to a leader who plans to hurt an innocent person). Otherwise, when you actually physically “take over” a government, it will be very offensive to its people. You would definitely not like someone who would violently come into your house and force his own changes, beyond the scope of the (true) said wrong, even if the changes are better (or, even if there’s no changes at all).
Remember:
A home without love is just a house.
Life without love is just an empty space waiting to be filled up.
Sex without love is just fine (someone wrote).
And, invasions without love is just… former Presidents.
Trains, trucks and cars:
I think the government should subsidize the railroad industry to get the bulk of the eighteen wheelers off the dangerous highways. The government should subsidize things that help the overall general public, especially concerning safety, that would not be able to compete on its own. Think! Also, try harder to bring back the same basic large amount of public transportation that all cities had back in the 1920s. People use the subways a lot in New York.
New York, New York: the city so nice they named it twice. Cliché?
Iraqi curfew:
Hey, that’s outsmarting the Iraqi insurgents when you implement a total day and night curfew, to stop an informed attack on the Green Zone. We all know that insurgents aren’t smart enough to just wait until the curfew is over. Plus, I’m sure it makes the Iraqi people like the new American controlled government just that much more, when they can’t go to work, can’t go to the store, can’t visit friends and relatives, etc. Oh, I’m sorry, I forgot we’ve changed the name of insurgents to terrorists so to help the Bush administration make it look like we had to take over Iraq to fight the people who did 9/11, instead of actually fighting the people who did 9/11. Every time I hear this lie from someone on the news, it makes me think our enemies are right about us. I’m getting sick of having to think that. Is now a good time to brag about my ignored Saddam Hussein release suggestion to solve the Iraq problem, or should I wait longer? I will gloat about what would have likely happened if Clinton would have stayed with my advice in February 1998, to lift the sanctions against Iraq and treat them like human beings. After my personal fax to the White House late on February 21, 1998, the newspapers reported February 23, 1998 that an all new agreement over a very tense situation with Iraq has been found which included the lifting of sanctions. After months (and actually years) of build up, the entire tense situation was actually (reportedly) resolved, that day. (Give credit where credit is due: Protestors had been continually telling to drop the sanctions since the Gulf War started, and before.) Then Clinton finally smartened up on April 28, 1998 and reneged on the deal. But, I still wonder if today’s situation in Iraq would be better if Clinton wasn’t so smart. I think today many Americans might think so. The sanctions didn’t cause Saddam Hussein to miss any meals, but I understand hundreds of Iraqi children actually died as a result of the United States imposed sanctions. After we took Baghdad (in 1993) we boasted how good we are by lifting our “comprehensive economic sanctions” at that time, which had a “harsh impact on innocent Iraqi civilians.” You mean poor camel drivers are smarter than America’s top leaders and press? Apparently so. Oh, I forgot, we did free them all (in 2003) from Saddam Hussein’s 1980s attacks on his enemies. And, today, those enemies are now traveling to Baghdad to make themselves even more enemies. And there are others sects coming in from all directions. Maybe Bush should just ask Saddam Hussein how he did kept the peace in Baghdad for so many years. What was his secret? – Something we could probably share with Mexico?
Paying the harder jobs the most:
I have this strange theory that when America discovers that being (totally / intelligently) “fair” is the best thing for the economy, then we will likewise be glad to invite the Mexicans to “Come on over baby, whole lotta shakin' goin' on” –Jerry Lee Lewis, 1957, “We ain't fakin' Whole lot of shakin' goin' on” “Ahhhhh Let’s Go !!!”
Dead On Arrival:
Then there’s another kind of rock, or I should say “Bloodrock”: “I remember: we were flying along, and hit something in the air” –Mohammed Atta, 9-12-01. So, take your choice for the future. “God in heaven, teach me how to die.” A little song, a little dance, a little 9/11 music written in 1971 down your pants.
Saddam Hussein:
That Kuwaiti slant drilling into Iraqi oil fields, which caused the Gulf War (and everything after), is like if your neighbor somehow tapped into, say, your electric line; then your electric bills became double, as he uses your electricity. Then, when the police inform you they’re not going to do anything to stop him, wouldn’t you feel like stopping him yourself? So, I still think Saddam Hussein should be let out; and, a hell of a lot of restitution made to the Iraqi people. Or, it looks like the Phelps’ theory may start to appear like it’s going to happen: mass destruction of future human beings. And that just makes for a happy family in Topeka. It is really hard for America’s current leaders to understand the word “fair.” Yeah, see, you really hate me more than you do the Phelps’.
Americans’ 12-year name for Saddam Hussein. Today being held by Mahmoud Ahmadinejad:
“‘Evil,’ evil is his one and only name. ‘Evil,’ in his mind there is no other game! … Do you find his sudden ways, invite you? Does he excite you? If his contradictions should attract you, should he distract you?” –Austin Powers: The Spy Who Shagged Me theme song. Well, George, are you going to shag, or are you going to let Iraq sag while Americans nag, until you tag Iran to gag so you can wag? Then old Hag can brag about the flag (which I say’s just a zigzag rag), until you bag another military snag. Then you’ll all think Time Mag is just a drag.
North Korea:
I (an International Man of Mystery) haven’t had the time to research their gripe, but they are probably building weapons of mass destruction just for self defense purposes. Otherwise, they’d be selling them to the terrorists who want to level the Green Zone, or Tel-aviv, or Washington, DC. So, they (North Korea) can’t be all that bad. I think it’s hard for Americans to reckon, because most of us have lived in a country protected by weapons of mass destruction all our lives, but if you live in one of these countries that doesn’t get along with the United States, you’d sleep a lot better at night knowing that you could sufficiently defend yourself from a continually threatening foe: true “terrorists” (the U.S.) who are so stupid that I can attest they / we don’t even know it. Just (yes, “just”) treat’em like human beings and we can all probably get along. I think one would feel safer, also, in any country if it knew the “what if” was less likely; well, maybe a country that wasn’t a bully, like maybe China or Russia. Fox News guests can still say that we don’t provoke any of this terrorism, and most people will “just” believe it. I am really having a hard time trying to believe that these terrorists, even Osama bin Laden, are doing it all just for the fun of it, or just because we all aren’t Muslims. Again, the Old Testament like Muslim teaching differs from the Christian turn-the-other-cheek teachings: Muslims are taught to avenge people who truly wrong them (just like we do, via our cop-outs). So, however you want to handle it, Muslims definitely think we’re truly wronging them, and they will surely fight to the death as long as they continue to believe it. Just because Fox News and many others want to believe that America is always in the right, isn’t the solution. We are so dumb that we think more threats against North Korea is going to make them do as we say, but I think the more we threaten violence, etc., the more nuclear bombs they’re going to want to make. If China or Russia told the U.S. they plan to attack us, would we just hand over all our nuclear weapons to them? When you mix dumb with evil, it just makes you end up looking dumber. Take a country that we are on good terms with, that doesn’t have nuclear weapons, then continually start threatening an invasion. Eventually they will start a nuclear weapons program. Even minor (thinking) threats can lead to major wars: does anybody know why Japan bombed Pearl Harbor? Most Americans think they had absolutely no reason. They’re just E-vil, evil is their one and only name. I’m trying to tell you all: dumb animal emotions are going to lead to something that makes 9/11 look like nothing. You ALL think you’ll change right before it happens; but, like 9/11, I’m guessing the terrorists won’t tell you before they do it, for some unknown reason I can’t explain. Bush still thinks the more violence we impose, the more they will like us and respect us. He actually thinks threats of death will stop suicide bombers. I think God is also laughing at this man.
I’ve noticed throughout my life, that people who are either evil and/or dumb, don’t like me; so, hopefully I do have a calling from God. I mix with evil and/or dumb people the same way water mixes with grease (ask a printing company).
“The Bush administration is in a state of denial,” etc.:
It just sounds like Bush is very unhappy with how the Iraq war has turned out. Now George, if you are suffering, and don’t like want Americans are saying, then you need to download “Hold On” by Wilson Phillips, 1990. That should cheer you up. O’Reilly, you might also benefit from their advice, since you also seem troubled by the same misfortune. Here, I’ll even try to help you: To all my recipients, start singing: All we are saying, is give O’Reilly a chance. Sounds like the both of you could use a hug. Mr. T has a new counseling program on TV Land called “I pity the fool,” so you do have some friends out there. He wants to help. Of course, I’ve heard the T stands for testosterone, so you may want to check out Stuart Smalley’s 12-step program first. I think you’ll learn something from Stuart. Stuart is a very nice person. You just have to trust me. So what ever you do, don’t give up; because, as you can tell by looking at the picture – look at the picture George – life can be… good:
Amish forgiveness:
Today’s mainstream Christians are understandably dumbfounded by the Amish’s forgiveness of the schoolroom murderer, and actual money they gave to his widow. The Amish attribute there closeness to the Gospel by shunning technological advances. Of course, 150 years ago, lack of these improvements did not preclude great evil; therefore, I assume their divorce from the contemporary just psychologically helps them follow Jesus’ teachings. God loves technological advances. God hates the evil that takes advantage of it, doubly when they call themselves Christians (as it teaches our young the wrong understanding of Christ). The impossible: There should and can be a correct following of Jesus, with advancements to boot, without the need of reclusive. There is only one religious leader that can do it. There is only one “summed up” commandment of God: The Goldenrule. As I’ve always found, there is no stereotype which I fall into: The Amish appear to be cruel to horses (which progress has eliminated the need to do); and, likely consider sex as a conditional value.
Mark Foley scandal:
Sounds like another frivolous case to me, like was the Monica Lewinsky scandal. Somewhat worse since any kind of sexual talk or pictures with minors is technically illegal. Hypocritical? – Yes, but that’s not a crime. The fact that he’s not married might be seen as an actual plus. This guy even looks a little like Clinton. Look, 12 year old girls are “allowed” to get married (have sex) in this country if it’s simply to the financial advantage of the taxpayer (less welfare paid to pregnant girls), so 16 and 17 year-old boys are not being harmed especially with just cyber sex (unless it’s under duress). Any 16-17 year-old boys or girls who reject the propositions are going to just have to learn how to politely say “no,” which will just help them prepare for future dating! I still think that allowing the slaughter of innocent animals (for our selfish bellies) is much more evil than sexual inquiries. Millions of innocent animals have to face the same horrific terrors of Texas Chainsaw Massacre daily! Animals with the same exact feelings that you have! – Another irrefutable issue. And, according to doctors, a vegetarian diet is the most health diet one can choose. This Foley scandal is another case where the people in this country (now the Democrats) are too dumb to know what can really hurt them and what really can’t hurt them (or anybody). Other Republicans who biasly overlooked it? – No big deal. Again, no one was really harmed, other than being harmed by a very stupid and evil society that says they were harmed. Technically illegal? – Yeah, but I think there’s a big difference between “children” and teenagers. My true Christian free love writings are written for the applications of legal adults only, just for that reason; but, technically, I don’t see how teenagers are harmed if they wish to explore their safe sex desires. Actually, I think it makes for the many bitter teenage problems when they are restricted in doing so. STD cures will be more quickly found / exposed only once the Church accepts the true Gospel. – That’s one of my principal goals. And hopefully someday, they’ll have like a pill or something one can take, to keep from getting pregnant. Lots of influential spin exaggerators like O’Reilly like to call all minors “children,” but www.answers.com’s number one, top definition of “child” is “A person between birth and puberty.” “Adolescent” is the correct pithy referring to post puberty. Sexually, there’s a BIG difference between the two; so, there should be an exclusive word for people under puberty that doesn’t extend secondarily to beyond puberty. That’s actually a contradiction more than an extension. So, today, when the News says he had sex with a child, I don’t know if the “child” was pre- or post- puberty; which, again, makes a big difference. (Of course, our welfare department would probably like it better to be pre-puberty, because they know they won’t have to pay out any welfare for an unwed mother.) In addition to the democrats new flip-flop concerning politician’s sexual morals, I have also been entertained by Fox News reporters who have so quickly switched their strong condemnation against over-age adults who have had sexual relations with “adolescents” (“tough on sex offenders” policy), just for their own selfish Republican financial betterment assumption. Yes, they’ve actually been defending Foley’s moral point. With a bit more thinking, they might “smarten up” and shower Foley and even Hastert, etc. down the drain, if they really want to “appear” better than Democrats. But, none of them (Foley, etc.) are going to have to worry about that big talk about “strengthened offender registrations,” because favoritism is still very strong in this country. Americans actually believe that it’s favoritism that makes us cultured, whole and good, over equality and fairness; simply because we can easily manifest and relish in the high degree of over-charity and release we will give to certain (undeserving) individuals. Dumber or dumberer? I think the statutory rape laws are based on the fact that many parents are too embarrassed to inform their adolescents (or, just call ‘em “teenagers”) about not having sex; and therefore, adolescents are easy targets for older hard-up men (and there are a lot of hard-up males in today’s society). You see, since we are all very dumb animals, a person (an adolescent) will easily believe that sex is a very good thing to do, until someone tells them it’s not. Similar to Income Tax evasion, penalties have to be severe because of the strong desires of the high numbers of sexually deprived men (I mean, “honest” prostitution is even illegal, dirty and/or dangerous, and therefore in very low quantity today). Then it’s coupled with most people’s (adult’s) ignorant natural evil thrill to do something they are not supposed to do, which this society and church also causes! Jesus’ sexual truth in the Gospels, coupled with my commentary, and the Golden Rule becoming a (real) fad, would completely end this “problem.” And why are these statements so different in our society: “Do I make you a little horny?” –Foley, versus “Do I make you horny, baby, yeah, do I?” –Austin Powers?
Oh, behave!
Mr. Critical – My dream… is to conquer ignorance.
-- Home (Index) --