Subject:  Peroxide the taters out of your ears and listen to me:

 

January 27, 2007

 

Humans are smarter than animals, right?  So, that’s why we don’t think animals have the same feelings as we do.  Constance Marie: “I stopped eating meat about six years ago, when I was working on the movie Selena. During the shoot, I had to hold a chicken for five hours—if you hold it and feel its little heart beating for hours, you just can’t think about eating it.”  Yes Constance, but we are smart humans, and therefore know that we don’t know that.  Kim Basinger: “If you could feel or see the suffering you wouldn’t think twice. Give back life. Don’t eat meat.”  Sound like a good pitch for the pro-life (anti-abortion) people as well. 

 

PETA’s Vegetarian Starter Kit (free booklet I picked up at Wild Oats Natural Marketplace, 2-9-06; sorry no copyright date):

“Pigs, cows, and chickens are individuals with feelings—they experience love, happiness, loneliness, and fear, just as dogs, cats, and people do. More than 27 billion animals are killed by the meat industry each year—in ways that would horrify any compassionate person. The average American meat-eater is responsible for the abuse and death of about 90 animals per year.”  If you think God is appalled by war, with something like 10 million dying in WWII, and that lasting several years, compared to 27 billion per year, you can see why logic says that God is most appalled, by far, by the eating of animals.  Animals shouldn’t be born if we’re not going to treat them fair.

 

Smarter people is the only solution:

When people become smart enough to realize they don’t like the sledge hammer hitting this lady’s head, laws against it will be passed.  But, I’m living in a time where the media is too dumb to even know the Iraq solution.  I tell you, smarter people is the only solution!

 

Everyday I hear people on Fox News angered by the terrorists, but all are too stupid to realize the terrorists are feeling the exact same emotions about them for the same kind of reasons.  Neither side is smart enough to know the targets of each side’s wrath are exactly via the same kind of morals.  E.g., George W. Bush is too dumb to realize that he is (ethically) exactly like Saddam Hussein.  Otherwise, both would enjoy each other’s company and stories.  George W. Bush put to death someone just like himself.  Everyone is just mindless one-step emotion.

 

This story got to Mr. Critical:

So if your steak isn’t as tasty as normal, blame it on some county policy. – And, email me and I’ll share your grievance with others.  Because, I haven’t the slightest idea why you “God-favored” individuals would want to ignore me.  I think all meat-eating news people should entertain themselves by visiting the slaughterhouse once a week, to join in on the fun of kicking animals when they’re down.  I’m-a wishin’ aliens would come down and do the same to humans – just so I could get a great laugh.  Again, what’s going to happen when the mainstream quits ignoring those things they know they need to ignore?

 

People are just like rocks: it really doesn’t do anything different until something moves it.  Surely rocks are our descendants.

 

 “In the U.S., animals raised for food are fed 70 percent of the corn, wheat, and other grains we grow. The world’s cattle alone consume a quantity of food equal to the caloric needs of 8.7 billion people—more than the entire human population on Earth.”  Historically, the only reason we desire meat today is because it used to be a delicacy because it was more expensive to procure.  Since we’re smart, one would be “better” than his neighbor if he could afford meat for his family.  “Much of the waste from factory farms and slaughterhouses flows into streams and rivers, contaminating water sources.” 

 

“Vegetarians and vegans live, on average, six to 10 years longer than meat-eaters.”  Well, if that’s the case, then aren’t we sort of stupid for eating meat?  They also say we don’t need all that extra protein: “In Western countries, our problem is too much protein, not too little.  Most Americans get at least twice as much protein as they need. Almost everything contains protein; unless you eat nothing but junk food, it’s almost impossible to eat as many calories as you need for good health without getting enough protein.”  “The vast majority of all cancers, cardiovascular diseases, and other forms of degenerative illness can be prevented simply by adopting a plant-based diet.”  Unlike clawed and fanged predators, basically the human body is designed of the same characteristic as the other vegetarian animals.  We’re not naturally designed to eat meat (mainly because of digestion).  (I do like the way Hollywood portrays vampires, werewolves, etc. as evil humans because of their fangs.  Take away them fangs and put’em in the ring with Rocky and see what happens.)  Unlike the lion, dog, etc. we’d have a heck of a time tearing through a carcass in the wild, without our recently developed tools (only 2-5 million years ago?).  And, with our sense of smell, I don’t understand why we even got started.  The bible says Eve “saw” that predators consumed it, so “knowledge.”  God forbid it, but He couldn’t call it “meat” because we wouldn’t have it today to read.  Instead it’s mysteriously described as “Fruit of the knowledge of good and evil” and “Tree of life,” but doesn’t bother to tell the most important factor – if God wants us to not eat it – exactly what fruit and exactly what tree?  Earlier, the word “life” doesn’t get used / described until God makes animals.  (Even today, I don’t see “pro-life” people describing plants [nor even animals] as “life.”)  God pre-warned that he “surely” will avenge us by eventually killing us in the same inhumane manner (in our afterlife) (Gen. 2:17).  Now, since God (the highest God) is everything, and therefore still feels the animals’ pain, no Pagan, Jewish or Christian sacrifice is going to get you out of it (and since Churches today say God cannot change).  Such is just another man-made cop-out (not every word in the Bible is from God. Contradictions like Jesus genealogy in Matthew versus Luke, prove it.)  As with every flaw in this imperfect, developing world, the Bible needs to be taken with a grain of salt.  But, the major problem with that is the Protestants, e.g., will spin it to what the rich and selfish want it to say.  Therefore, things must get worse before they can get better.  However, God may have had a plan: Since the Protestants read Paul as saying “faith alone,” they have allowed all the original Bible text to be easily obtainable for people like me to access.  The Catholics wanted this information left concealed, for reasons I’ll explain on another day.  Today’s Protestants would like a lot of it sealed as well, but since the Protestants are well divided and have no Pope, with its false impression of honesty (to its own people), the information gets published.  By the way, “day” in Hebrew in Genesis also meant “an age.”  Plus, logically, when the “seasons” passed and God “saw” hit as good, it was more than one day because it takes 365 days for at least one set of seasons to pass.  Yet there is a modern museum, with dinosaurs, rock formations, etc., in Eureka Springs, Arkansas dedicated to proving how the earth has only been here for about 6,000 years.  I don’t exactly see how the simple explanation of how Cain and Abel acquired wives, will disprove the existence of God or the Bible??  Interpretation of allegory maybe.  So, with that, we have go back and address the problem of saving face – it can continue through generations; which proves we believe what we are taught: logic and rationale is secondary.  And, we’ve been “taught” that eating meat is O.K., as well as marriage / monogamy (as a requirement for sex), artificial salvation, war, and working for less.  Since you may be able to tell that the marriage standard is breaking apart in the younger generation, now might be a good time for some religious sexual truth.  But… the catch-22 is many would have to lose face.  Ironically, marriage is breaking apart and free-sex is still a major taboo.  That’s because (1) many “independent” women are still far from being “independent,” (2) because we still have a hate- / jealousy-based society (it’s still what we’ve been taught, via “monkey see, monkey do”), (3) because the government thinks financially burdened fathers is still the best method, (4) so the church won’t lose face, and (5) (maybe just to spite that mean Mr. Critical).

 

I’d love it if somebody would email me and explain to me how I’m the dumb one.  But do email me and explain to me why everyone does want to be technically a son of a bitch (concerning the eating of meat).

 

Now, there’s nothing unethical about using their body after an animal dies of natural causes, for those needs that require animal meat or parts.

 

Unlike most people, on my death bed, I’m going to be proud about what I’ve said.

 

I innocent of accusations:

I think Borat made up for the hard time he gave everyone… when he released the chicken.  Not really bad guy!  Rickles (and country) should be proud.

 

Love between adults:

You say: “I’m in love with my spouse and nobody else, so you’re wrong Mr. Critical about your open love / free sex theory!”  I refute by comparing how parents can love more than one child. – It’s the same with adults.  In fact, God “commands” it in John 13:34.  Only loving your spouse is very easy when we are put-down for loving others.  You can easily love more than one parent, sibling, singer, comedian, or movie producer simply because it is “allowed”: you are not put-down for doing so.  Naturally you can love them all in various degrees, but you can still love more than one.  (You can also hate more than one critic at a time: unless you find that special one who just vastly exceeds all the rest.)  Now, you can be in love with your wife, your mistress, and your girl friend all at the same time, but in my world, you can all go out together at the same time (to see one of those loved comedians), like how a family, co-workers, or just friends “can.”  I’m sorry, but the most correct and descriptive reason why you think the way you do is because you are brainwashed and you are dumb.  Open sex can open a lot of freedom doors.  People might get so used to being honest that they’ll forget how to lie: “About 60 percent of men and 40 percent of women will have an affair at some point in some marriage.” –Monogamy Myth, Therapist Peggy Vaugn.  And, I can only imagine the percentage of how many just don’t tell their spouse about their extramarital desires / itches.

 

Make love, not war!  And, gay slammers: Want to talk “natural”?  Our closest DNA match:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bonobo:

“Sexual intercourse plays a major role in Bonobo society, being used as a greeting, a means of conflict resolution and post-conflict reconciliation, and as favors traded by the females in exchange for food. Bonobos are the only non-human apes to have been observed engaging in all of the following sexual activities: face-to-face genital sex (most frequently female-female, then male-female and male-male), tongue kissing, and oral sex. … Bonobos do not form permanent relationships with individual partners. They also do not seem to discriminate in their sexual behavior by gender or age, with the possible exception of sexual intercourse between mothers and their adult sons … When Bonobos come upon a new food source or feeding ground, the increased excitement will usually lead to communal sexual activity, presumably decreasing tension and allowing for peaceful feeding.  Bonobo males frequently engage in various forms of male-male genital sex ….” 

 

http://en.wikinews.org/wiki/Bonobo_chimp_threatened_in_Congo:

“The Bonobo is best-known for resolving squabbles through sex rather than violence. Rivals are greeted with genital handshakes and sensual body rubs. Fights are often settled with a ‘French kiss’ and sex, either heterosexual or homosexual.”  (Rom. 16:16; 1 Cor. 16:20; 2 Cor. 13:12; 1 Thes. 5:26: “Greet one another with a holy kiss.”  1 Peter 5:14: “Greet one another with a kiss of agape-love.” [“Agape” meant “sexual love” prior to the 20th century.]  We don’t do it today.  Was Paul a Bonobo?)

 

Well… we’s (today) definitely be smarter then Bonobos cause Bonobos can’t communicate well enough to tell one another to not be shameful and unnatural; instead, we have many conflicts and wars.  “… they are more closely related to humans than to gorillas ….  Scientists…argue that the Bonobo and Common Chimpanzee are so closely related to humans, their genus name should also be classified with the Human genus Homo”  Since-a Bonobos are closer related to humans, and much more creative and promiscuous den duh gorilla, duz dat mean gorilla has to be smarder dan Bonobos?  I hope someday O’Reilly will be as smart as da Bonobo.

 

Discovered in 1928, the Bonobo:

By the way, it walks upright.

 

So, you can talk, huh?

 

Homosexuality being “unnatural”:

We do all these unnatural things because it’s to our advantage, or we just prefer it that way (like the lawn).  Creating a desire between all tangible (adult) humans is a great love building tool.  It also releases a major freedom.

 

Freedom Writers (the movie):

Why would I go see a movie with that title?  You can nip all those kinds of problems in the bud, when you (1) stop the guilt and shame trip for those on welfare (God intended everyone free food and free building materials); (2) encourage open-sex with a desire for diversity in looks (that will stop the prejudice); and (3) have the Churches often quote fair afterlife punishment (Matt. 5:23-26) for anyone who hurts an innocent person.  Mine (only) is the perfect solution.  So close, but so far.

 

Party Cove – could this be what the people really want?:

Just next door, centered between the two major hillbilly hubs (Kansas City & St. Louis) and a bit south, nestling wet down the cleavage between two large hills, awards Anderson Hollow Cove.  Internationally famous, protected by the Missouri Department of Parks, I understand this is the biggest exhibition of public sex between strangers in the entire country, by far.  Throughout the summer, as many as three thousand boats hook together at one time (enough to make a sailor blush), with the local hill folk as the main participants.  But the rest come to hillbilly heaven from all parts of the world.  The local merchants love the extra business, and therefore wish it to not end.  As boaters crank up the music of Kansas City’s one and only KY, and sharing the same, there’s everything from boats furnished by Anheuser-Busch, to the filming of professional porn movies, to Protestant church boats with bullhorns preaching eternal damnation – the whole nine yards.  I’m not making this up.  You can read all about it on the Web, but O’Reilly and Hannity, be prepared to cover your eyes.  Actually, many politicians have tried to stop it, but the Governor hasn’t given the O.K. for the Sheriff to go in and start busting heads, so there’s not much they can do about it.  But, you’d better make sure your blood-alcohol is below the legal limit before you sail out of the cove.  I guess the electric company finds out what happens when they give Li’l Abner and Daisy Mae there own watering hole: Lake of the Ozarks: A gorgeous man-made lake, providing some excellent boating, and more than 1,150 miles of Ozark tree-covered hillsided shoreline.  One of the few reservoirs in the country where the cabins are built right up to the shore.  Every now and then someone enthusiastic (usually women) will tell me about it, but believe it or not, I’ve never been there (the cove: I’ve been to the lake many times: it’s a huge lake).  However, the next time I’m in the high woods, searching for free food in that Ozark Mountain Country, I’ll be sure to bring along my binoculars.  And, the next time you pass through the Arch, take a turn under the Grandglaize Bridge, and do someone for me.  “I dreamed I was there in hillbilly heaven -- oh what a beautiful sight” –Tex Ritter, 1961.

 

— Family —

Family News From Dr. James Dobson, Focus on the Family, January 2000, p. 4 (second paragraph):

Yes it will, as long as religious leaders continue to lie and denounce sex outside of marriage.  Also, many problems will continue until there’s a Nationally Paid Child Support Program.  Or… we could return the land to: free food, free land, free building resources, clean water and clean air.  But I suggest the former.  (But, I sure could live in that big sturdy Daniel Boone house just west of St. Louis: “a four-story structure built between 1804 and 1810 [11 years before Missouri became a state].”  Six years: that’s the same amount of work-time one spends to graduate 6th grade.  So, ethically, our government should give everyone with a 6th grade education who has failed in our system: (1) a four-story house, that can probably withstand a tornado; (2) toss a variety of human-food seeds out of an airplane areawide, to replenish what Lewis and Clark reported as plentiful; (3) I don’t know how they’ll restore clean water – I guess the fair thing would be to make the cattle ranchers who cause the bad water, to hook up free plumbing and continuous free water into the home.  Sounds like a pretty good place to live; some might even call it a paradise.  And, (4) if they graduated high school [12th grade], the government should pay the cost of having an extra / outside worker help build the house, for six years; or, hook up and pay for an equal worth of electricity [that’s electricity equivalent to six years of full time labor].  I remember having to sleep in my car for a while, right after I graduated from high school – I should have spent the prior 6 years building my four-story house, which I still don’t have.  Well… I’m just having fun with the word “fair.”  I think the reason these former resources aren’t free anymore has similarity to why homeless shelters kick them out during the day, so to find a job, where they can, in most cases, be somebody’s butt hole.  But “I” think it smells better in paradise.)

 

If I’m right, I need some strong support from Jesus:

“And great multitudes went with Him. And He turned and said to them, ‘If anyone comes to me and does not hate his father and mother, wife and children, brothers and sisters, yes, and his own life also, he cannot be my disciple.’” --Luke 14:25-26.  “Father,” “mother,” “wife,” “children,” “brothers” and “sisters” are maybe a few examples of “family.”  “Hate” might be a “strong” kind of word.  You see, the family standard begets favoritism.  And favoritism definitely begets problems with “others” outside your family: inconsiderations, less thoughtfulness, feelings of less importance, etc.  “Hate” may be a drastic word, but The Word of God needs to be emphasized on this very important Goldenrule subject!  I’d like to have “Focus on the Family” explain that one.  They’d say, “Well, that shows the opposite of what God / Jesus really meant,” because people will believe a strong spin (ask O’Reilly).  But I bet he never uses this verse for a family support example.  Also, “hate” ones own life / self expresses the drastic need to know exactly who the “Devil” is: it’s everyone’s excessive selfishness, which is the root cause of all religious / ethics based problems.  And, an open / free love / sex society will lessen excessive selfishness immensely.  No, it’s not the same as being a rich guy who goes to a lot of hookers.  Once everyone is involved, you’ll see what I mean.  For example, there’s a big difference between having sex with someone who also enjoys it, and a prostitute who really doesn’t enjoy it.

 

Mark 3:31-35:

“[31]Then His brothers and His mother came, and standing outside they sent to Him, calling Him. [32]And a multitude was sitting around Him; and they said to Him, ‘Look, Your mother and Your brothers are outside seeking You.’ [33]But He answered them, saying, ‘Who is My mother, or My brothers?’ [34]And He looked around in a circle at those who sat about Him, and said, ‘Here are My mother and My brothers! [35]For whoever does the will of God is My brother and My sister and mother.’”  Thank’s God, “I” need the support.

 

http://4forums.com/political/showpost.php?p=58588&postcount=85, View Single Post:

“Jesus renounced his family, declaring that he had no relatives except the faithful (Mark 3:31-35). Jerome interpreted this as a mandate to destroy marriage and the family. … He said every man who loves his wife passionately was guilty of adultery. … There was no Christian sacrament of marriage until the 16th century. Catholic scholars say the wedding ceremony was ‘imposed on’ a reluctant church, and ‘nothing is more remarkable than the tardiness with which liturgical forms for the marriage ceremony were evolved.’”

 

http://www.fortunecity.com/roswell/prophecy/23/News/Dec97.htm, The Annwn Magazine & Newsletter, Dec. 1997, Newletter # 16, Malanda, QLD, Australia, from the book “Death of an Evil God” by Dr. J Chiappalone: “On Marriage”:

Christian Fathers and Doctors of the Church in the early years were opposed to this institution of marriage.

 

I fully know that you’ve all be taught otherwise.  I guess strong trust needs to be counteracted by strong words: “hate.”  Want more:

 

Matthew 10:35-37:

35 “For I have come to ‘set a man against his father, a daughter against her mother, and a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law’; 36 and ‘a man’s enemies will be those of his own household.’ 37He who loves father or mother more than Me is not worthy of Me. And he who loves son or daughter more than Me is not worthy of Me.”

--That doesn’t sound like today’s family standard to me; but, that is Jesus talking.  Ha-ha-ha-ha-ha.  Hardy-har-har-har-har-har.  I’m LOL and rubbin’ it in.

 

Well… I know what you’re thinking, because “I” was the one that caused the “largest Protestant denomination” (including Jerry Falwell) to forsake Christ in June 2000 (10-00 stories):

http://www.adherents.com/largecom/baptist_fewerSBC.html, “Conflict Among Baptists Nears Climax”:

“NEW YORK (AP) - Is America's largest Protestant denomination unraveling? … When Southern Baptist leaders rewrote the denomination's doctrinal statement, ‘Baptist Faith and Message,’ this year, [Jimmy] Carter found it unacceptable, he told The Associated Press. Especially troubling, he says, was the deletion of this sentence: ‘The criterion by which the Bible is to be interpreted is Jesus Christ.’ That, Carter says, "removed the written premise we had always accepted, that Scripture is interpreted by the words and action of Jesus Christ. Which means in effect the Scriptures are interpreted by pastors or officials who lead the Southern Baptist Convention. This is contrary to my basic beliefs.’”

http://www.adherents.com/largecom/baptist_SBC_Carter.html, President Jimmy Carter Leaves Southern Baptist Convention:

“He said the ‘most disturbing’ reason he and his wife decided to disassociate themselves from the Southern Baptist Convention was the elimination of language in June that identifies Jesus Christ as ‘the criterion by which the Bible is to be interpreted.’”

 

Duke rape victim:

Unless Mike Nifong directly písses-off the Attorney General, I think the state will continue their case against them Duke boys even if the “victim” changes her story from being sexually assaulted to they murdered her that night.  One has to understand the power of saving face.  Then the New Black Panther Party will say, “We don’t care how many innocent students we frighten Mr. O’Reilly, we aren’t going to stand for any white boys who murders a sister.”

 

Isn’t that called retirement?:

Every now and then I’ll try to get another perspective by turning it over to CNN or Headline News.  I don’t know exactly why, but I always end up turning it back to Fox.  I think Fox does a better job of reporting the facts.  CNN and Headline News seem to be more mindless commentaries and fluff stories, which causes my mind to wander.  Then when something important comes up, I miss the first part of it because I wasn’t paying attention.  It reminds me of my old school days.  Fox has mindless commentaries also, but it doesn’t seem like as much.  CNN and Headline News seem to be inundated with commercials.  Their commercials even seem more boring than Fox’s.  Possibly I’m just tuning in at the wrong time, but I think CNN has finally earned the position where they don’t have to work anymore, while loads of money is coming in.  As I recall, it was channel-flipping that led me to Fox in the first place.  But, still not perfect: Fox still needs to become more fair and balanced, concerning mainly the war issue.

 

Shiites say they want Sunnis out:

Open-sex with a fad for diversity in looks, etc. would stop this problem, and without having to rely on logic, teachings of fairness, or trust.  But, true, I would have to become their religious leader first.

 

The general public really doesn’t know as much as the experts:

You know, the only reason our forefathers saw it better to have majority voting and juries is to stop the vast unfair corruption and favoritism of our trusted authorities.  In other words, even though we’re going to get O.J. verdicts now and then, it’s still the best way to fight evil, than trusting a bias and face saving judge or politician, who do have the capability to decide better (but, far from perfect).  Therefore, that’s pitiful, but it has to be that way.  The church forsaking all artificial salvations, and preaching fair afterlife punishment (Matt. 5:23-26), weekly, for anyone who hurts an innocent person, is the only solution.  Of course, I’m talking to an audience that doesn’t even know that judges and cops are bias and corrupt.  Well… the rules say they can’t be… so there’s proof I’m wrong.  Those are also the same mindsets that think Hannity doesn’t need to append “Right or Wrong!” at the end of his bumper sticker, simply because our government never does anything “wrong.”  Mr. Criical, What are ya, “stupid”?

 

Proof by definition that the status quo is evil:

The definition of the word “liberal” is “generous,” and “open to new ideas for progress, and tolerant of the ideas and behavior of others” – well, that’s a description of America’s Freedom of Speech.  Also: “broad-minded.”  The definition of “conservative” is “to oppose change.”  This shows how “conservatives” are not really “Americans” (or respectful of its laws).  The news is filled daily with ethical based problems, but apparently “conservatives” want them to stay the same.  Conservatives’ generosity is apparently artificial.  They don’t like “progress” because progress is making things better, and that can only be done via taking from the rich and lucky and giving to the poor and unlucky.  Ironically, today’s church is moreover for the rich and lucky, but Christ was for the poor and unlucky.  Therefore, critically, the conservatives are going straight to Hell, and the liberals are going to be judged (Luke 17:34-36).  Think about it: If you were God, would you want to resurrect conservatives?  Sure, they’re down on their knee in from of God / you, but the second their on their own, they’ll stab you right in the back.  And I’m even telling you you’re doing it, and you won’t change.  In the Kingdom of Heaven, conservatives won’t be allowed to be free, on their own: they’ll have to stay in “prison.”  Otherwise, when it came to details, they’d hurt everyone else with their excessive selfishness, and literally destroy Kingdom of Heaven paradise.  You see, people will be as much self-willed (and basically free) then as they are now.  Not until conservatives have suffered equally can they change, and I don’t know any conservative that would be willing to do that: until they become the victim by not their choice.  Conservatives will wish I told them this before they did harm and deceit to others.  However, another definition of “liberal” is “not strict.”  But that’s because the laws and justices are so unfair and bias that a “liberal” tends to relax what the laws and justices define as criminal.  This is the result, because no one today has a good base definition of right and wrong.  But, if the Church and laws implemented just one law (restriction), i.e., “Never hurt an innocent person, and only those who hurt an innocent person should be hurt,” then we’d have a good stable base definition.  With that, we can be “not strict” with those who don’t hurt an innocent person, and be adequately strict with those who do.  And, when Blue Oyster Cult sang “Don’t fear the reaper” (1976), it’s true that many victims of society may not have to, but if you’ve ever “hurt an innocent person,” I tell you, do fear the reaper!  There can never be a better resolution.  The answer is somewhere between today’s two extremes.

 

Iraq partisan divide:

I think the only reason the Democrats criticize the Iraq war is just because it currently supports the majority of American sentiment.  I think if Saddam Hussein had tried to kill one of Bill Clinton’s close relatives, then Clinton would have done the same thing George W. Bush has done; then the Republicans (including George W. Bush) would be the ones later opposing the war.  It all has to do with the game (and majority opinion).

 

“Mighty U.S. Warlord” gives his State of the Union address:

And, there’s San Francisco sitting right behind him.  The dead would be proud.  I mean: The hippy movement which died in the ‘70s would be grateful.  No, I mean: The Grateful Dead, the band, would be proud.  Something like that.  So, let’s dig out our old black light posters, and be prepared for the next election.  It must have been frustrating for Nancy Pelosi in full view of the camera:  She had to make a quick decision whether she agreed or didn’t agree with each statement by her gestures and applause.  It is kind of nice, though, to hear the President tell his stances, and immediately see the other side’s opinion.  I think she may have made some mistaken accidental support in a few cases.  Does that mean she will have to change her view on those?  If it was me, I’d just applaud at everything, just because I love being at a party, then let Mr. Critical condemn him later.  How come everyone stood up when he talked about fighting HIV-AIDS?  Doesn’t everyone know, HIV-AIDS is the only thing left that’s holding together the marriage standard?  Do they all want to fool the public into thinking they want what the public wants, or is this just support for another impractical abstinence lesson?  And, was it really appropriate when Nancy held up that 2009 calendar for all of us to see, right behind his back, with her reassured look pointing at January?  Or, was that just me reading some of the expressions.  Who was that other handsome, intelligent looking gentleman in the background?  Where was the other Vice President: Cindy Sheehan?  (The way Iraq is going, just wait a year or two Mr. Critical.)  That is what we’d all like to see, both Vice Presidents sitting behind the George W. Bush next year, right?  I saw Hillary out there.  Actually, she might be a third Vice President by now. … Well… she’s hot to the people at New York’s Museum of Sex, but… would not be so much in my country. … … … NOT! – I’m just kidding you Hillary… I like very much to make romance inside of you, when you visit my state / country.  Yes, Very Nice!  How much?  Monica Lewinski: not so much!  New York might have a sex museum, and California has topless beaches, but I’ve got the actual biggest public sex orgy in the country right next door.  So, y’all need to catch up, y’hear?  But don’t bring your prostitutes or your retarded brother!  I have new girl friend, so I’ll bring cheese to share.  Soon, Borat sing: ♪♫ U.S. greatest country in the world; all very nice place, now run by little girls ♪♫.

 

I’m not sure I want good health insurance:

Maybe I’d be better off with no health insurance at all.  Because, when a doctor sees a good, well paying insurance guarantee, I worry that they’ll give me the whole nine yards, knowing that he/she can do all their stuff, and highly overcharge the insurance company to boot.  But, what do I do when the pain doesn’t go away?  I’ve got it, I’ll have the insurance, but initially tell the doctor I don’t have insurance, then I’ll know if I really need the surgery.  I remember a doctor once that did have me scheduled for surgery (a surgery I knew I needed) then actually cancelled it when he found out my wife’s insurance wouldn’t pay (wife’s company changed carriers and we were still under pre-existing conditions).  I told him I’d pay it out of my pocket, but he still didn’t want to do it.  I did have it done several months later by another surgeon, who happened to charge the insurance company about double what he originally quoted me.  I let the insurance company know; they didn’t care.  I knew two people who had surgery (at different times) for the same ailment, and both came out with an all new ailment of the same kind.  It was quite a surprise in both cases.

 

Chew slowly: Fox News discovers that WMD material can be smuggled into U.S., hidden in sausage and fish:

Well… there’s another reason to go vegetarian.  Apparently, you turn the dial on the dog to sniff for enriched uranium-235, and it’s blocked by the powerful smell of dead flesh.  So, be vigilant when you start seeing all our dogs going crazy after sniffing all that unreachable slime.

 

Thanks Fox, for helping me meat my goals:

1-26-07 Fox News runs ad telling that “PETA kills animals”; which is the first I’ve ever seen.  (see http://www.petakillsanimals.com/.)  I intend to find fault in everyone; but darn, it’s called “euthanasia”: mercy killing.  All animal shelters do it.  Hopefully someone will do it to me if I become desolate.  I suggest people who have a lot of money build a great big farm somewhere, where unwanted cats and dogs can safely run freely and be properly cared for.  I further suggest, e.g., deer hunters to spend twice the amount of time shooting deer……………. with a dart (instead of a gun), each with a veterinarian who will give it a birth control operation.  That way there won’t be so many running into cars moving at 70 mph.  Then you can run an ad about how car dealers aren’t selling as many cars as they used to.  Eventually, place all, e.g., deer in large sanctuaries so none will run into another car again.  PETA could even have some hypocrites (but even Mr. Critical doesn’t do what he says the people of the future will have to do; e.g., he could even get married again.), but it’s what’s in their literature that I don’t want equal competition with.  I don’t even know if I’d tell Fox “nice try.”  I think I’ll call it pathetic.

 

Why Fox News refuses to discuss (or frequently discuss) slant drilling, al-Saa restaurant, Amiriyah civilian shelter, etc.:

If Fox News was to be frank with me, they would tell me they do it all just for the money.  And that they’re doing good / just fine the way they don’t tell the people what they don’t want to hear: They’re not “stupid” (but, they are “stupid”).  So that’s why we need more people like me, who will correctly tell both sides of the story so people won’t vote to do things which cause, e.g., “the thorough destabilization of the Middle East.”  I can’t revert that mess, but I can stop future blunders; because, I guarantee you, Fox News won’t (but they definitely “think” they can).  So, if you can “understand” me, then you tell me what I should do, or how I should present it.  I understand how Fox News can’t agree with my freedom of sex solution, otherwise they’d have to send a bouquet of slender toothwort to their wives everyday for the rest of their life.  The sex lies is something the Catholic Church is going to have to someday admit to.

 

Getting them before they get us:

We killed their wives and children, they want to kill us – are we really justified in killing them first?  Let me know how I’m wrong?  Otherwise, let me know when the Iraqis are going to “just” accept it.  Maybe you need to realize that the general American public will support whatever is for their greedy benefit: they really don’t care if we kill innocent people.  But, in this case, the Iraqis very much do.  I think you’ll find that to be the case in future endeavors as well.  The Iraq war is so “unpopular” with the American public just because it is such an obvious blunder.  But, again, since 1990 the heat from the media and the people has been to invade, so it’s a 17 year blunder.  So, not killing innocent people is what the American public wants, they’re just too stupid to know it.  Until, I (only) become a recognized world religious leader, it will continue to happen.  I hate to tell you that Iraqi insurgency with increase as we continue to kill “innocent” insurgents.  It’s easy-easy for me to reckon this – all I have to do is think how Toby and Willie would do it over here.  Easy for me, hard for you.  I’ll remind you of what I’m saying now, when Russia or China sees us as a threat, and decides it wishes us to not have WMDs anymore.  Hannity says We know we’re suppressing other countries’ WMDs because we’re selfish.  We don’t care.  We don’t believe in your God of fairness, we believe in the churches god of whatever we want it to be.  We know we are making them angry when we kill their innocent people.  That just lets us know why we can’t let them have their country back.

 

Remote controls:

Apparently remote controls are designed to only be used in the air with the hand wrapped around it.  Well, here in Kansas, many times the remote will be just sitting on the coffee table, or end table, still pointing toward the T.V., and all I want to do is just quickly push a button (e.g., mute, stop, rewind, play, volume up, etc.) without having to take all the extra time and hassle of having to pick it up each time.  But most of the ones I have go flipping sideways because the bottom edges have been rounded, I guess to fit only in the hand.  How come I’m the only one who doesn’t want to have to pick up the thing every time?  My potato will be comfortably situated on the couch, and I can see in plain sight the button I want to push, but most of the time I have to grab the sides pretty hard with at least two fingers while I try to accurately tap the button I want, which is now harder to see because my hand is in the way.  And, of course, I’m a hand washing freak (been all my life, not just since the ‘90s), so if I’m snacking, one clean finger will be easier to find then having to wipe foodstuff all over the remote.  Remote controls have been around for at least 30 years.  If they had stability on just the four corners, and kept the rest rounded, that’d work.  When?  In 2050 maybe?  Guess I’ll have to just spend more time thinkin’ and writin’ instead of watchin’.  Especially when I watch CNN where one feels the need to mute out all those commercials (so my mind can wander without all that racket).  And I’m sure if I keep watching, Hannity will eventually lose control and punch out… Colmes.  Humans live too long: one can only grin-and-bear-it so long before job not important anymore.  I tell you, Hannity like big balloon with air pump valve stuck open.  He ready to blow like romance explosion with other man’s wife.  Watching Hannity after my last letter, I felt hand coming out of television grabbing my neck.  Get a partition guys.  However, with all the Trump search hits one gets nowadays, if Hannity googles somebody’s eyes, he’ll probably become as popular as Rosie.  By the way, this Rosie have lips like goddess.  I only wish I could leave this Kansas City, and travel to California, for wet romance kiss.  Why not?  I like it.  I will like it very much.  If this Donald Trump masterbate to Rosie picture, I have rich prostitute sister buy small mighty company, then fire him, and sell him to Jews.  That’s enough.

 

Vain:

I bet I can introduce more useful improvements for the world in just one paragraph compared to any thousands or millions of pages in our government’s files.

 

Making food taste better: Is that good or bad?

Well, it makes us want to eat more, therefore it make us either fatter or constantly craving.  I comment; you decide.

 

Mr. Critical, in Kansas – Try to keep up California and New York.

 

 

-- Home (Index) --